Protocol: Horizon 2.0 - Unfolded
Because the case involves cross‑border elements and may require cooperation with other authorities — including the Italian Data Protection Authority — the investigative phase typically lasts 18 to 24 months or longer.
This material can then be used to support civil or criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, particularly when the case concerns the publication of harmful, misleading, or defamatory content.
- the Malicious Communications Act 1988,
- the Communications Act 2003,
- and any other applicable legislation relating to harmful or false communications.
This often occurs well before the Italian criminal trial reaches its conclusion, which may take 3 to 5 years due to procedural complexity and international cooperation.
“Although the communication was inappropriate or harmful, the statutory threshold for conviction is not met…”
- confirm that the communication or article was harmful or misleading,
- acknowledge reputational damage,
- reinforce the credibility of the complainant,
- support the proportionality of corrective or compensatory measures.
- mandatory publication of the final judgment on the defendants’ websites,
- publication of a corrective article,
- removal of harmful or defamatory content,
- any other remedy necessary to repair reputational harm.
- the publication of the final judgment on the websites of the media outlets or individuals involved,
- as a form of public correction and reputational restoration.
- Italian investigations typically last 18–24+ months due to cross‑border cooperation.
- Once closed, the evidence can be used in UK civil or criminal proceedings concerning harmful or defamatory publications.
- UK proceedings are faster (~12 months).
- UK judgments — even without conviction — can be used in Italy.
- Judicial remarks such as “harmful but below threshold” strengthen the complainant’s position in Italy.
- At the end of the Italian criminal trial, the court may order corrective measures, including:
- mandatory publication of the judgment on the defendants’ websites,
- publication of a corrective article,
- removal of harmful content,
- other reputational remedies.